| ||
![]() | ||
|
| You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register ) |
| Random quote: WTF? OMG! - (Added by: BWE) |
From Fiction to Fact in Three Simple StepsJump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page] | View previous thread :: View next thread |
| Examples and Discussion of Wingnuts -> Essays or observations on wingnuttery | Message format |
| Utu |
| ||
![]() Regular ![]() ![]() ![]() | While preparing an upcoming wingnutological report on dragons (the longcoming "Wingnuts Take Flight!") I stumbled upon an even crazier version of Otherkinism: People claiming the Matrix ripped off their life stories; not only ripped them off, but got them wrong. Through their story and others, I have come up with some guidelines for turning fiction into fact. [Spoooooon!--Ed] ![]() "Damn skippy, Trin. Ya'll best jump aboard this here bandwagon before ya'll get left behind. We're headin' to Zion! Yeeehaw! We's gonna have a ho-down in a cave all the whiles you and Neo have an awkward roll in the hay! Yippy-kay-yay!"
I'll be happy to explain the melange of quantum physics that we and many people believe is responsible for bringing us here, now, to this world... [3 paragraphs omitted] Everything that can exist, does. Energy follows thought, and there are infinite parallel existences out there beyond our own; this has been proven by mainstream science as well as philosophy. Every decision we make opens another parallel path in which we made the opposite choice, or no choice at all; and people who may be considered 'fictional' in this world, our subjective reality, are just as 'real' as we are, on another plane of existence. And sometimes... they cross over. Very rarely, and even more rarely with intact memories... a lot of people, after knowing us, have come to refer to it as "quantum reincarnation". Close enough, I guess. That's a pretty good explanation; but I prefer the one from Last Action Hero. Come on, just say you came out of the movie screen due to a magic golden ticket. After all, that's how I got here... Mr. Anderson. MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! ![]() That was silly. On second thought, you're right: quantum twaddle is the way to go. Neo's site: Truth of the Spoon. OMFG that NAME! Truth of the spoon... I've seen bizarre appropriations of fiction occur before. This other case involved the psychic Phyllis Schlemmer appropriating Star Trek. PHYLLIS V. SCHLEMMER AUTHOR OF THE ONLY PLANET OF CHOICE The Only Planet of Choice is based on the communications transceived through Phyllis' deep-trance work from an enlightened circle of universal beings known as "The Nine". The international research group also had among them the "Star-Trek" creator: Gene Roddenberry. When Roddenberry asked them where they came from, their answer was "the zone you call cold in Deep Space". Does "Deep Space Nine", the hugely popular television sequel to "Star-Trek", sound familiar? Wow, the Nine even intoned the capital letters and everything! Now check out this neat trick: Critics of individuals who support The Ashtar Command on this planet have accused them of "playing Star Trek." What if they found out that the actors on "Star Trek" were actually playing Ashtar Command? Have you ever noticed that the Star Trek insignia looks like the letter "A?" It is documented in The Only Planet of Choice, compiled by Phyllis V. Schlemmer and Palden Jenkins (Bath, England: Gateway Books, 1993), that Gene Roddenberry attended channelling sessions led by Ms. Schlemmer and "Tom" of the "Council of Nine" "Council of Nine: Tribunal Teachers governing our immediate super-galactic and galactic region, subject to change in evolving 'new programs' of the Father's kingdom.). It has been alluded to from other sources that Roddenberry had been a Commander or received his inspiration from sitting in on channelling sessions." Want to steal an idea from a fictional source? Claim the fictional source stole it from you! It's all out there in the collective unconscious for the taking. Check out my attempt: I am a Xenomorph spiritually. ![]() Woohoo! You say there are no myths or legends about Xenomorphs? I bet I could cherrypick and appropriate some descriptions from ancient texts to find some. But I don't need to because there is a movie about them! You don't honestly believe Ridley Scott, H.R. Giger, and various others involved made it up do you? No, they got the idea from the Great Beyond just like Phyllis Schlemmer claims Gene Roddenberry got the idea for Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. It's all part of the collective unconscious. It's as the Quran says: there is nothing new under the sun. Why can't xenomorphs exist? What, just because you haven't seen one and documented it to your liking? Well that's just plain ignorance. So there you have it. I hope you know how its done now.
| ||
| |||
| BWE |
| ||
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() | On second thought, you're right: quantum twaddle is the way to go. Wow. This one has some real potential. | ||
| |||
| Utu |
| ||
![]() Regular ![]() ![]() ![]() | Victor Stenger has a good article on "quantum quackery" in the Skeptical Inquirer that summarizes and addresses similar claims. Nevertheless, quantum mystics have greeted the possibility of nonlocal, holistic, hidden variables with the same enthusiasm they show for the conscious wave function. Likewise, they have embraced a third view: the many worlds interpretation of Hugh Everett (Everett 1957). Everett usefully showed how it was formally possible to eliminate wave function collapse in a quantum theory of measurement. Everett proposed that all possible paths continue to exist in parallel universes which split off every time a measurement is made. This has left the door open for the quantum mystics to claim that the human mind acts as sort of a "channel selector" for the path that is followed in an individual universe while existing itself in all universes (Squires 1990). Needless to say, the idea of parallel universes has attracted its own circle of enthusiastic proponents, in all universes presumably. This review has a concise description that comports with my experience of the quantum leg-humpers: Quantum mysterions may embrace science in principle, but they have little more interest than creationists in learning about it in practice. Under their adoring gaze, the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics, which make concrete predictions accurate to dozens of decimal places and which underlie the technologies of microchips and lasers, are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums. At the same time, quantum mysticism promotes a vision of spiritual satisfaction achieved not by the hard transformative work of ritual or study, but by the mechanism of consumer choice. In the infinite sea of possibility here promoted, nothing is real except what you choose to accept. Which is not that far from the creationist position — there, too, empirical evidence is brushed aside and reality becomes what you’d like it to be. There also seems to be an intersection between quantum twaddle and postmodernism which can be found on google under postmodern science and quantum philosophy. Hey, look here's an example. He mentions quantum physics and Kuhn in the same post. Cool. | ||
| |||
| Utu |
| ||
![]() Regular ![]() ![]() ![]() | And some more: Quantum Jesus. Booya. | ||
| |||
| Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page] |
| Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
| (Delete all cookies set by this site) | |
| Running MegaBBS ASP Forum Software © 2002-2010 PD9 Software | |

From Fiction to Fact in Three Simple Steps