Search Forums | Albums | Quotes
Daily Wingnut
Daily Wingnut ->  Random Discussion -> Philosophy: Can logic and thinking help? -> View Thread

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Random quote: It is, as John Edwards would agree, a matter of working with your abilities in order to be able to ‘see’ the morphogenetic energy shapes of the reptilians amongst us, or any other type of being for that matter. BUT, always remember, there are ‘good’ reptilians as well as those who follow the negative agenda here on Earth just as there are ‘good’ and bad’ of any race, even the angelic realms and ascended masters. This was made very clear in the original mini-series of ‘V’ where there was an underground movement even among the reptilians taking over the planet. --Peter Farley. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sumer_anunnaki/reptiles/reptiles46.htm
- (Added by: Utu)


A priori
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]		View previous thread :: View next thread
   Random Discussion -> Philosophy: Can logic and thinking help?Message format
 
BWE
Posted 2009-05-19 6:20 AM (#61)
Subject: A priori


Extreme Veteran

100100100
That which has gone before.

Immanuel Kant realized that we use models to understand space and claimed time was a component of the model. He arrived at this conclusion after considering how we can know what is on the other side of an object etc. That we can model the object and create an a priori concept of it in order to navigate it seems quite obvious today. But Einstein's general relativity puts time as a thing, not an idea.

Does this disprove Kant's assertion that time is a priori?

If I mangled the argument, feel free to point out where.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Danhalen
Posted 2009-06-19 4:02 AM (#370 - in reply to #61)
Subject: RE: A priori


New user


BWE - 2009-05-19 9:20 AM

Does this disprove Kant's assertion that time is a priori?
No. Kant asserted there is such a thing as synthetic a priori knowledge. If time is a thing and we can know about it through introspection alone then it is an example of synthetic a priori knowledge.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
BWE
Posted 2009-06-19 1:20 PM (#375 - in reply to #61)
Subject: Re: A priori


Extreme Veteran

100100100
But if space time is a place, then it is not synthetic. No?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Danhalen
Posted 2009-06-29 6:49 AM (#467 - in reply to #61)
Subject: Re: A priori


New user


Sorry about the delay. I just got back from vacation yesterday.

Space/time, being part of "the world out there," is synthetic. It is the analytic which does not exist "out there."
Top of the page Bottom of the page
BWE
Posted 2010-02-17 3:24 AM (#633 - in reply to #467)
Subject: Re: A priori


Extreme Veteran

100100100
Damn. I always get that backwards. Analytic is in here, synthetic is out there. I forget Kant as fast as I read him.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)
Running MegaBBS ASP Forum Software
© 2002-2010 PD9 Software